Is the Fujifilm X-T5 Still Worth Buying Four Years In?
Forty megapixels in a body that still costs significantly less than full-frame alternatives with comparable resolution. If you're shooting architecture, product, or landscape work and don't want to commit to the weight and cost of a Sony A7R or Canon R5 system, the X-T5 remains a legitimate answer. The case for it hasn't collapsed just because it's been on shelves a while — the resolution holds, the file quality holds, and the price has only got more competitive as newer bodies pushed it down. Where it still compromises: video shooters have better options, and the buffer will test your patience in action work. But for deliberate, high-res still photography on a Fuji system? Four years hasn't killed it.
Related
Panasonic L10: The LX100 Successor That Actually Fixes Everything
Sony FX5 Announced: Full-Frame 5K, Internal X-OCN RAW, 4K 240p
Leica SL3-P Review: 44MP, 40fps Full-Frame at $6,695
GoPro enters the interchangeable lens market with MFT mount
Insta360 Is Building a Micro Four Thirds Camera
Fujifilm X-T6 Confirmed, Fujikina Paris Is First Hands-On Stop
More from Fstoppers
Stay ahead of the curve
Get the Pixelfetch digest delivered to your inbox every morning.