Is the Fujifilm X-T5 Still Worth Buying Four Years In?
Forty megapixels in a body that still costs significantly less than full-frame alternatives with comparable resolution. If you're shooting architecture, product, or landscape work and don't want to commit to the weight and cost of a Sony A7R or Canon R5 system, the X-T5 remains a legitimate answer. The case for it hasn't collapsed just because it's been on shelves a while — the resolution holds, the file quality holds, and the price has only got more competitive as newer bodies pushed it down. Where it still compromises: video shooters have better options, and the buffer will test your patience in action work. But for deliberate, high-res still photography on a Fuji system? Four years hasn't killed it.
Related
GoPro enters the interchangeable lens market with MFT mount
Insta360 Is Building a Micro Four Thirds Camera
Nikon ZR Review: The Z6III Goes Full Video Beast
Canon R6 III vs Sony a7 V: Real-World Side-by-Side Test
Canon R6 III vs Sony A7 V: The Under-$3K Hybrid Shootout
Sony a7 V Review: Partially-Stacked Sensor Changes the Game
More from Fstoppers
Stay ahead of the curve
Get the Pixelfetch digest delivered to your inbox every morning.