Industry Opinion

Why a stills-only camera wouldn't actually save you money

4mo agovia DP Review News

Why a stills-only camera wouldn't actually save you money

auto_awesomePixelfetch Take

Manufacturers don't remove video to lower costs — they remove it to protect sales of other models. A stills-only Z6III wouldn't undercut the hybrid; it would just be the same camera with features locked out, priced identically or higher to justify a separate SKU.

Follow the storyZ6 III timeline Nikon ZR timeline

Read full articlearrow_outwardon DP Review News

camera industry hybrid cameras stills vs video pricing

Related

Getty-Shutterstock $3.7B Merger Dead After Regulators Block the Deal

Adobe Acquires Topaz Labs

Photographer Risks His Life at Bondi. Network Runs His Shots. Pays Nothing.

EssilorLuxottica Reportedly in Talks to Acquire Nikon

650 Freelance Photographers Refuse Contract Over Image Ownership and Syndication Rights

Sony Makes Formal Acquisition Proposal for Tamron

More from DP Review News

ISO Invariance Explained: What It Actually Measures The 'Compact' Camera Label No Longer Means Compact Neewer CM26 MAX Wireless Lav Kit: 48kHz/24-bit, $Under-$200 Canon RF 20-50mm F4 L IS USM PZ: Sample Gallery and Raw Files

Stay ahead of the curve

Get the Pixelfetch digest delivered to your inbox every morning.