Industry Opinion

Why a stills-only camera wouldn't actually save you money

2mo agovia DP Review News

Why a stills-only camera wouldn't actually save you money

auto_awesomePixelfetch Take

Manufacturers don't remove video to lower costs — they remove it to protect sales of other models. A stills-only Z6III wouldn't undercut the hybrid; it would just be the same camera with features locked out, priced identically or higher to justify a separate SKU.

Read full articlearrow_outwardon DP Review News

camera industry hybrid cameras stills vs video pricing

Related

Photographer Risks His Life at Bondi. Network Runs His Shots. Pays Nothing.

Adobe Acquires Topaz Labs

EssilorLuxottica Reportedly in Talks to Acquire Nikon

Jeff Schewe, Photographer and Digital Pioneer, Has Died

Court Rejects 'AI Could Have Made It' Copyright Defence

Nikon Stock Skyrockets Amid Rumors of a Sale

More from DP Review News

Hasselblad Masters 2026 Winners AnnouncedJUNE 30, 2026 DJI Osmo Pocket 4P Unveiled: Dual Camera Gimbal with 20mm + 60mmJUNE 29, 2026 Tamron 17-70mm F2.8 Coming to Canon RF and Nikon Z APS-CJUNE 28, 2026 Leica SL3-P Sample Gallery: Nürburgring and Studio ShotsJUNE 27, 2026

Stay ahead of the curve

Get the Pixelfetch digest delivered to your inbox every morning.