Industry Opinion

Why a stills-only camera wouldn't actually save you money

8h agovia DP Review News

Why a stills-only camera wouldn't actually save you money

auto_awesomePixelfetch Take

Manufacturers don't remove video to lower costs — they remove it to protect sales of other models. A stills-only Z6III wouldn't undercut the hybrid; it would just be the same camera with features locked out, priced identically or higher to justify a separate SKU.

Read full articlearrow_outwardon DP Review News

camera industry hybrid cameras stills vs video pricing

Related

Arri Acquired by German Entrepreneur Thomas Riedel

Fujifilm Discontinuing RA4 Analog Paper

ASMP & PetaPixel Launch Free Town Halls on AI's Impact on Photography

DJI Osmo Pocket 4 Officially Blocked from US Market

Sony Halts CFexpress & SD Card Sales Amid Semiconductor Shortage

OM CEO Sugimoto Takes Majority Stake in OM System

More from DP Review News

How Super Bowl Halftime Shows Became Fully Scripted Films Panasonic's Lumix Lab App: What It Actually Does 45 Years of Bird Photography: What a Nikon Z8 Shooter Swears By 70 Years of Shooting: What Stephen Felce's Kit Reveals

Stay ahead of the curve

Get the Pixelfetch digest delivered to your inbox every morning.